High spatial resolution photogrammetry using the structure from motion (SfM) method and unmanned aerial vehicles
Main Article Content
Obtain high-resolution digital elevation models requires modern geospatial technologies, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) and Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS). However, these technologies have limitations, such as their high cost and the requirement of high logistics. The integration of novel advances in computational technology and image analysis, with the use of low-cost aerial platforms, represent a viable alternative for the generation of high- precision photogrammetry. This work integrates the use of low cost unmanned aerial vehicles with common digital cameras and the image analysis method known as Structure from Motion (SfM). This integration allows the development of photogrammetry with spatial resolution below one meter using a minimum of control points. An orthophoto was generated with a resolution of 20cm and a digital elevation model with a resolution of one meter using the Structure from Motion method, the digital elevation model presented advantages over a model generated by LiDAR whose spatial resolution is five meters, the Structure from Motion model presented higher resolution, as well as a drainage network in detail. The results of this work can help with the development of low cost techniques for the detection of changes in the earth's surface that require high precision and continuous monitoring.
AgiSoft. (2016). AgiSoft PhotoScan Professional (Version 1.2.6) (Software). https://bit.ly/2P7yKlY
Environmental Systems Research Institute. (2016). What is lidar data? Environmental Systems Research Institute. https://bit.ly/3XscFOa
Environmental Systems Research Institute. (2012). ArcGIS Release 10.1. Environmental Systems Research Institute.
Hugenholtz, C., Whitehead, K., Brown, O., Barchyn, T., Moorman, B., LeClair, A., Riddell, K, & Hamilton, T. (2013). Geomorphological mapping with a small unmanned aircraft system (sUAS): Feature detection and accuracy assessment of a photogrammetrically-derived digital terrain model. Geomorphology, 194, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.03.023
Johnson, K., Nissen, E., Saripalli, S., Arrowsmith, R., McGarey, P., Scharer, K., Williams, P, & Blisniuk K. (2014). Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion. Geosphere, 10(5), 969-986. https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01017.1
Magdaleno, F, y Martínez R. (2006). Aplicaciones de la teledetección láser (LIDAR) en la caracterización y gestión del medio fluvial. Ingeniería civil, 142, 1-15.
Micheletti, N., Chandler, J, & Lane, S. (2015). Structure from Motion (SfM) Photogrammetry. En L. Clarke y J. Nield (Eds.), Geomorphological Techniques, (pp. 2-12), British Society for Geomorphology.
Peel, M., Finlayson, B., & McMahon, T. (2007). Updated world map of the Koopen- Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11(5), 1633-1644. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-11-1633-2007
Pereira, J. (2013). Modelado 3D en patrimonio por técnicas de structure from motion. Revista Ph, 1, 77- 87. https://bit.ly/3GK4mHB
Rango, A., Laliberte, A., Steele, C., Herrick, J., Bestelmeyer, B., Schmugge, T., Roanhorse, A, & Jenkins, V. (2006). Research Article: Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Rangelands: Current Applications and Future Potentials. Environmental Practice, 8(3) 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466046606060224
Watts, A., Ambrosia, V, & Hinkley, E. (2012). Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Remote Sensing and Scientific Research: Classification and Considerations of Use. Remote sensing, 4(6), 1671-1692. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4061671
Westoby, M., Brasington, J., Glasser, N., Hambrey, M, & Reynolds, J. (2012). ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology, 175, 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021
Xiang, T., Vivoni, E, & Gochis, D. (2014). Seasonal evolution of ecohydrological controls on land surface temperature over complex terrain. Water Resources Research, 50(5), 3852-3874. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014787
Downloads
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.