Main Article Content

Authors

It constitutes a very common place in Kant´s philosophy, to reduce the rollof the body to the support that the institutions offer to the phenomenal knowledge. By the other hand it is important to consider the restrictionse stablished by the moral philosophy in this aspect. Taken in consideration both horizons the functions such as sensibility and the corporality, are presentedas subordinated to the theoretic understanding and to the practicereason. The purpose of this article is designed to point out the roll of the firstorder that both faculties had to the understanding of the total human existence.Therefore, some of the Kantians considerations offered to its anthropologyin a pragmatic way, as well as its philosophical esthetic, come to revealthe high value that both phenomena have of its philosophy

Castro Hernández, J. C. (2009). A philosophy of body in Kant? An aesthetic-antropologica approximation. Praxis Filosófica, (28), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i28.3278
Gadamer, H.G. (1993): Verdad y Método. Madrid, Sígueme.

Kant, E. (1991): La Antropología en Sentido Pragmático. Madrid, Alianza.

Kant, E. (1996): Critica del Juicio. México, D.F., Porrúa.

Kant, E. (1995): Critica de la Razón Pura. Buenos Aires, Alfaguara.

Kant, E. (1998): Filosofía de la historia, Bogotá, F.C.E.

Marleau-Ponty, M. (1970): Lo Visible y lo Invisible, Seix-Barral, Barcelona.

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1996): Meditación de la técnica, Obras Completas, V, Madrid,Revista de Occidente.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.