Understanding Presupossition as Anaphora Some Problems on Kripke‘s Account
Presupposition anaphora Anaphora meaning Meaning truth-conditions Truth-conditions Contextualism Literalism Kripke
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
According to Kripke, the traditional approaches to presupposition do not work in some compound sentences because the presuppositions from their component clauses traditionally assign presuppositions to each clause in isolation. I agree with this criticism, but I think that a contextual requirement is sometimes needed in order to determinate the meaning of presupposition included in a complex sentence, and this view can solve some problems in Kripke’s semantic approach.
Colomina Almiñana, J. J. (2011). Understanding Presupossition as Anaphora Some Problems on Kripke‘s Account. Praxis Filosófica, (32), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i32.3444
BACH, E. (1970). “Problominalization”, Linguistic Inquiry, 40:2, pp. 121-2.
BACH, K. and Harnich, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication andSpeech Acts. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
CARSTON, Robyn (2004). “Truth-Conditional Content and ConversationalImplicature”, en: C. Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction,Stanford, CSLI Publications, pp. 65-100.
DAVIES, M. (1981). Meaning, Quantification and Necessity. London,Routledge.
DONNELLAN, K. (1966). “Reference and definite descriptions”, en: S.Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 52-64.
DONNELLAN, K. (1978). “Speaker references, descriptions, and anaphora”,en; P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, San Diego,Academic Press, pp. 47-68.
EVANS, G. (1977). “Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses (I)”, en:su Collected Papers, edited by J. McDowell, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 76-152.
EVANS, G. (1980). “Pronouns”, en: Collected Papers, edited by J.McDowell, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 214-248.
FREGE, G. (1892). “On Sense and Nominatum”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.)(2001), The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 186-198.
GEACH, P. (1967). “Intentional Identity”, Journal of Philosophy, 64:20,pp. 627-632.
GROENENDIJK, J. and M. Stokhof (1991): “Dynamic Predicate Logic”,Linguistics and Philosophy, 14:1, pp. 39-100.
HEIM, I. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite NounPhrases. Amherst, University of Massachusets.
HEIM, I. (1983). “On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions”,en: S. Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 397-405.
HEIM, I. (1992). “Presupposition Projection and the Semantics ofAttitude Verbs”, Journal of Semantics, 9:2, pp. 83-221.
KAMP, H. (1981): “A theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, en:S. Davis and B. S. Gillon (eds.) (2004), Semantics: A Reader, Oxford,Oxford University Press, pp. 234-262.
KAPLAN, D. (1989). “Demonstratives” y “Afterthoughts”, en: J. Almog,J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan, Oxford, OxfordUniversity Press, pp. 481-563 y pp. 565-598.
KARTTUNEN, L. (1974). “Presupposition and Linguistic Context”, en: S.Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 406-415.
KARTTUNEN, L. and S. Peters (1979). “Conventional Implicature”, en:Ch.-K. Oh and D. Dineen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition,New York, Academic Press, pp. 1-56.
KING, J. (1987). “Pronouns, Descriptions and the Semantics ofDiscourse”, Philosophical Studies, 51:3, pp. 341-363.
KING, J. (1991). “Instantial Terms, Anaphora and Arbitrary Objects”,Philosophical Studies, 61:2, pp. 239-265.
KING, J. (1993). “Intentional identity generalized”, Journal ofPhilosophical Logic, 22:1, pp. 61-93.
KING, J. (2004). “Anaphora”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
KRIPKE, S. (1977). “Speaker’s reference and semantic reference”,Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, pp. 255-276.
KRIPKE, S. (2005). “Russell’s Notion of Scope”, Mind, 114:456, pp. 1005-1037.
KRIPKE, S. (2009). “Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on theFormulation of the Projection Problem”, Linguistic Inquiry, 40:3, pp. 367-386.
LEVINSON, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory ofGeneralized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge (MA.), MIT Press.
LEWIS, D. (1979). “Scorekeeping in a Language Game”, en: S. Davis(ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp.416-427.
NEALE, S. (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge (MA.), MIT Press.
NEALE, S. (2006). “Pronouns and Anaphora”, en: M. Devitt and R.Hanley (eds.) (2006), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language,Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 335-373.
PAGIN, P. (2007). “Assertion”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
QUINE, W. V. O. (1960): Word and Object. Cambridge (MA.), MITPress.
RUSSELL, B. (1905). “On Denoting”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.) (2001),The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 199-207.
SEARLE, J. (1975): “Indirect Speech Acts”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.)(2001): The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 168-181.
SOAMES, S. (1982). “How Presuppositions are Inherited: A Solution tothe Projection Problem”, en: S. Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader,Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 428-470.
STALNAKER, R. (1973). “Presuppositions”, Journal of PhilosophicalLogic, 2:4, pp. 447-457.
STALNAKER, R. (1974). “Pragmatic Presuppositions”, en: Content andContext, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 47-62.
STALNAKER, R. (1978). “Assertion,” en: Content and Context, Oxford,Oxford University Press, pp. 78-95.
STRAWSON, P. (1950). “On Referring”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.) (2001),The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 208-214.
BACH, K. and Harnich, R. M. (1979). Linguistic Communication andSpeech Acts. Cambridge (MA), MIT Press.
CARSTON, Robyn (2004). “Truth-Conditional Content and ConversationalImplicature”, en: C. Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction,Stanford, CSLI Publications, pp. 65-100.
DAVIES, M. (1981). Meaning, Quantification and Necessity. London,Routledge.
DONNELLAN, K. (1966). “Reference and definite descriptions”, en: S.Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 52-64.
DONNELLAN, K. (1978). “Speaker references, descriptions, and anaphora”,en; P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics, 9: Pragmatics, San Diego,Academic Press, pp. 47-68.
EVANS, G. (1977). “Pronouns, Quantifiers and Relative Clauses (I)”, en:su Collected Papers, edited by J. McDowell, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 76-152.
EVANS, G. (1980). “Pronouns”, en: Collected Papers, edited by J.McDowell, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 214-248.
FREGE, G. (1892). “On Sense and Nominatum”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.)(2001), The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 186-198.
GEACH, P. (1967). “Intentional Identity”, Journal of Philosophy, 64:20,pp. 627-632.
GROENENDIJK, J. and M. Stokhof (1991): “Dynamic Predicate Logic”,Linguistics and Philosophy, 14:1, pp. 39-100.
HEIM, I. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite NounPhrases. Amherst, University of Massachusets.
HEIM, I. (1983). “On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions”,en: S. Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 397-405.
HEIM, I. (1992). “Presupposition Projection and the Semantics ofAttitude Verbs”, Journal of Semantics, 9:2, pp. 83-221.
KAMP, H. (1981): “A theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, en:S. Davis and B. S. Gillon (eds.) (2004), Semantics: A Reader, Oxford,Oxford University Press, pp. 234-262.
KAPLAN, D. (1989). “Demonstratives” y “Afterthoughts”, en: J. Almog,J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan, Oxford, OxfordUniversity Press, pp. 481-563 y pp. 565-598.
KARTTUNEN, L. (1974). “Presupposition and Linguistic Context”, en: S.Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 406-415.
KARTTUNEN, L. and S. Peters (1979). “Conventional Implicature”, en:Ch.-K. Oh and D. Dineen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition,New York, Academic Press, pp. 1-56.
KING, J. (1987). “Pronouns, Descriptions and the Semantics ofDiscourse”, Philosophical Studies, 51:3, pp. 341-363.
KING, J. (1991). “Instantial Terms, Anaphora and Arbitrary Objects”,Philosophical Studies, 61:2, pp. 239-265.
KING, J. (1993). “Intentional identity generalized”, Journal ofPhilosophical Logic, 22:1, pp. 61-93.
KING, J. (2004). “Anaphora”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
KRIPKE, S. (1977). “Speaker’s reference and semantic reference”,Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 2, pp. 255-276.
KRIPKE, S. (2005). “Russell’s Notion of Scope”, Mind, 114:456, pp. 1005-1037.
KRIPKE, S. (2009). “Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on theFormulation of the Projection Problem”, Linguistic Inquiry, 40:3, pp. 367-386.
LEVINSON, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory ofGeneralized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge (MA.), MIT Press.
LEWIS, D. (1979). “Scorekeeping in a Language Game”, en: S. Davis(ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp.416-427.
NEALE, S. (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge (MA.), MIT Press.
NEALE, S. (2006). “Pronouns and Anaphora”, en: M. Devitt and R.Hanley (eds.) (2006), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language,Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 335-373.
PAGIN, P. (2007). “Assertion”, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
QUINE, W. V. O. (1960): Word and Object. Cambridge (MA.), MITPress.
RUSSELL, B. (1905). “On Denoting”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.) (2001),The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 199-207.
SEARLE, J. (1975): “Indirect Speech Acts”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.)(2001): The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford UniversityPress, pp. 168-181.
SOAMES, S. (1982). “How Presuppositions are Inherited: A Solution tothe Projection Problem”, en: S. Davis (ed.) (1991), Pragmatics: A Reader,Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 428-470.
STALNAKER, R. (1973). “Presuppositions”, Journal of PhilosophicalLogic, 2:4, pp. 447-457.
STALNAKER, R. (1974). “Pragmatic Presuppositions”, en: Content andContext, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 47-62.
STALNAKER, R. (1978). “Assertion,” en: Content and Context, Oxford,Oxford University Press, pp. 78-95.
STRAWSON, P. (1950). “On Referring”, en: A. P. Martinich (ed.) (2001),The Philosophy of Language, 3rd edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press,pp. 208-214.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
De acuerdo con nuestra política (Licencia Creative Commons CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) los artículos presentados y sometidos al proceso editorial en la revista Praxis Filosófica no tienen costo alguno para sus autores ni retribuciones económicas para la revista. El artículo de carácter inédito, producto de investigación o de algún proyecto que se presente a Praxis Filosófica, no podrá estar sometido a otro proceso de publicación durante el proceso que se lleve en nuestra revista.