Main Article Content

Authors

Gilles Deleuze describes the task of “renversement du platonisme” as the search of it´s motivation. The purpose of the Theory of Ideas and of the dialectic method is a “will to select”. Deleuze identifies a platonic problem, which he calls the “problem of the claimants”. In this scenario, Ideas function as selection criteria and the dialectic method is the procedure by which Plato produces the difference among the objects of selection. Deleuze uses the concept of “simulacrum” for his interpretation of the inversion because he finds it suppresses the possibility of Ideas as selection criteria. However, this concept has a very narrow use in Plato´s dialogs. Strictly speaking, it is only in the Sophist that Plato develops the notion of “simulacrum”. In this article we will search through Deleuze´s use of the simulacrum and through his reading of Plato´s Sophist in order to support our interpretation of his reading as a symptomatic operation.

Sonna, V. (2014). DELEUZE AS PLATO´S READER. Praxis Filosófica, (38), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i38.3531
Deleuze, G. (1968) Différence et répétition, Paris, PUF. (y versión castellana Diferencia y repetición, Buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 2002)

Deleuze, G. (1969) Logique du sens. Paris, Les éditions de minuit (y versión castellana Lógica del sentido, Buenos Aires, Paidós, 2005)

Deleuze, G. – Guattari, F. (1991) Qu ́est-ce que la philosophie, Paris, Les éditions de minuit; (versión castellanaQué es la filosofía. Barcelona, Anagrama, 1993)

PLATÓN Sofista. En Diálogos, Vol. V. Traducción y notas de CORDERO, N. L. Madrid, Gredos, 1988

PLATÓN Sofista. República. Traducción y Notas de MÁRSICO, C. y DIVENOSA, M. Buenos Aires, Losada, 2005.

Aillez, E. (1992) “Ontología y logografía. La farmacia, Platón y el simulacro” en CaSSin, B. (comp), Nuestros griegos y sus modernos, Buenos Aires, Manantial, pp. 155-168. [Trad. Irene Agoff], 1994

Althusser, L – Balibar, E (1967) Para leer El Capital, México DF, Siglo XXI, [Trad. Marta Harnecker], 2004.

Audouard, X. (1966) “Le simulacre”, Cahiers pour L ́analyse, Vol. 3, pp. 57-72

Bouaniche, A. (2007) Gilles Deleuze. Une introduction. Paris, Agora.

Ginoux, I. (2005) “Platon” en Leclercq, S. (comp), Aux sources de la pensée de Gilles Deleuze, Vol. 1, Pris, Sils Maria Éditions, pp. 155-160.

Heidegger, M (1961) Nietzsche. Barcelona, Ed. Destino, [Trad. Juan Luis Vermal], 2000.

Lane, D. (2011) “On the Reversal of Platonism: The Mimetic Abyss”, SubStance,Volume 40, Number 2, (Issue 125), pp. 105-126.

Notomi, N. (1999) The unity of Plato ́s Sophist, University Press, Cambridge.

Williams, J. (2003), Deleuze ́s Difference and repetition. A critical introduction and guide, Edinburgh. Edinburgh University Press.

Sonna, V. “La reversión deleuziana del platonismo y la teoría estoica de la causalidad.” En BieDa, E. – MárSico, C. (ed.) Diálogos interepocales, Buenos Aires, Rhesis, (en prensa).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.