Alliances and conflicts between the stakeholders of a non-governmental organization: the case of Fundación de Acción Social Cáritas
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
The objective of this research is to identify the main stakeholders for Fundación de Acción Social Cáritas, as well as the convergences and divergences that they will have with this NGO about its challenges by 2035. For this, a panel of experts was formed through the expert competence coefficient K. Subsequently, the 15 selected participants selected and filtered the relevant stakeholders for the NGO with the support of Kendall's W statistical test. Once the list of stakeholders was obtained, the MACTOR method was developed to measure their levels of power and alliances and conflicts regarding the 9 strategic objectives of the Fundación de Acción Social Cáritas towards the year 2035. Among the main findings, 30 stakeholders who influence the Fundación de Acción Social Cáritas were identified. However, the most important alliances include the Ministry of Foreign Relations and Human Mobility, Cooperantes Fraternos, Cáritas Internacionalis, and Strategic Allies. On the other hand, the most prominent conflicts include Cáritas Internacionalis, the Partner Assembly of Fundación de Acción Social Cáritas, Professionals external to Fundación de Acción Social Cáritas, and Cooperantes Fraternos.
Appe, S. (2016). NGO Networks, the Diffusion and Adaptation of NGO Managerialism, and NGO Legitimacy in Latin America. Voluntas, 27(1), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9594-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9594-y
Appe, S., & Barragán, D. (2017). Universities, NGOs, and civil society sustainability: preliminary lessons from Ecuador. Development in Practice, 27(4), 472-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2017.1303035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2017.1303035
Ayuso, S., Rodríguez, M. Á., García-Castro, R., & Ariño, M. Á. (2011). Does stakeholder engagement promote sustainable innovation orientation? Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(9), 1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111182764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111182764
Baur, D., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The Moral Legitimacy of NGOs as Partners of Corporations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121437
Brickson, S. L. (2005). Organizational identity orientation: Forging a link between organizational identity and organizations’ relations with stakeholders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 576-609. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.50.4.576
Brickson, S. L. (2007). Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 864-888. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275679
Calvano, L. (2008). Multinational corporations and local communities: A critical analysis of conflict. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9593-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9593-z
Camelo, G. (2014). El Juego de Actores. In G. Gándara y F. J. Osorio-Vera (Eds.), Métodos Prospectivos: Manual para el estudio y la construcción del futuro (pp. 143–169). Paidós.
Cervantes, V. (2005). Interpretaciones del coeficiente Alpha de Cronbach. Avances en Medición (3), 9-28. https://www.humanas.unal.edu.co/lab_psicometria/application/files/8416/0463/3536/Vol_3._Articulo_1_Alfa_de_Cronbach_9-28_2.pdf
Chermack, T. J., Lindsey, K., Grant, C., & Barber, V. (2019). The Effects of Scenario Planning on Perceptions of Organizational Agility. Journal of Futures Studies, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201909_24(1).0002
Choup, A. M. (2006). Catalysts for Cooperation: Non-Governmental Organizations in Santo Domingo. Journal of Civil Society, 2(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680601104261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680601104261
Chung-Pinzás, A. (2017). Teoría y práctica de la prospectiva. Alfaomega.
Clarke, A., & Fuller, M. (2010). Collaborative Strategic Management: Strategy Formulation and Implementation by Multi-Organizational Cross-Sector Social Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0781-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0781-5
Clarke, A., & MacDonald, A. (2019). Outcomes to Partners in Multi-Stakeholder Cross-Sector Partnerships: A Resource-Based View. Business and Society, 58(2), 298–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660534 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316660534
Cruz-Aguilar, P., y Medina-Vásquez, J. (2015). Selección de los métodos para la construcción de los escenarios de futuro. Entramado, 11(1), 32-46. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/entra/v11n1/v11n1a03.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.18041/entramado.2015v11n1.21113
Cruz-Ramírez, M., y Martínez-Cepena, M. (2020). Origen y desarrollo de un índice de competencia experta: el coeficiente k. Revista Latinoamericana de Metodología de la Investigación Social, 10(19), 40-56. http://relmis.com.ar/ojs/index.php/relmis/article/view/origen_desarrollo_indice_competencia_experta/7
Gándara, G., y Osorio-Vera, F. (2017). Métodos prospectivos: Manual para el estudio y la construcción del futuro. Paidós.
Gasper, D. (2019). The road to the Sustainable Development Goals: Building global alliances and norms. Journal of Global Ethics, 15(2), 118–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1639532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1639532
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.
Hernández C. G., Barragán-Ochoa F., & Hurtado-Hurtado J. (2023). Innovation Scenarios for Ecuadorian Agrifood Network. Foresight and STI Governance, 17(1), 67-79. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2023.1.67.79 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2023.1.67.79
Hernández, C. G., y Hurtado-Hurtado, J. (2020a). Análisis estructural prospectivo: Variables clave para el desarrollo organizacional de Fundación de Acción Social Cáritas. Revista Empresarial, 14(1), 61-72. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7625559 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23878/empr.v14i1.181
Hernández, C. G., y Hurtado-Hurtado, J. (2020b). Escenarios prospectivos pos pandemia para la internacionalización del sector agroalimentario de Ecuador al año 2035. Revista de Estudios Políticos y Estratégicos, 8(2), 36-66. https://revistaepe.utem.cl/articulos/escenarios-prospectivos-pospandemia-para-la-internacionalizacion-del-sector-agroalimentario-de-ecuador-al-ano-2035/
Hochstetler, K., & Friedman, E. J. (2008). Can civil society organizations solve the crisis of partisan representation in Latin America? Latin American Politics and Society, 50(2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00011.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2008.00011.x
Jörby, S. A. (2002). Journal of Environmental Local Agenda 21 in Four Swedish Municipalities: A Tool towards Sustainability? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(2), 219-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964056022011631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560220116314
Keese, J. R., & Freire-Argudo, M. (2006). Decentralisation and NGO - Municipal government collaboration in Ecuador. Development in Practice, 16(2), 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520600562280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520600562280
Lewis, D. (2001). The Management of Non-Governmental Development Organizations: an introduction. Routledge.
López, E., & Vértiz, F. (2015). Extractivism, transnational capital, and subaltern struggles in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives, 42(5), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14549538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X14549538
Mac Ginty, R., & Williams, A. (2016). Conflict and Development. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315714059
Martin, N. (2012). There Is Abuse Everywhere: Migrant Nonprofit Organizations and the Problem of Precarious Work. Urban Affairs Review, 48(3), 389-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411428799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087411428799
Matheus-Marín, A., Romero-López, R., y Parroquín-Amaya, P. (2018). Validación por expertos de un instrumento para la identificación de habilidades y competencias de un profesional en el área de logística. Cultura Científica y Tecnológica, 14(63), 227-238. http://erevistas.uacj.mx/ojs/index.php/culcyt/article/view/2206
Meijering, J., & Tobi, H. (2016). The effect of controlled opinion feedback on Delphi features: Mixed messages from a real-world Delphi experiment. Technologial Forecasting and Social Change, (103), 166-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.008
Mert, A., & Chan, S. (2012). The Politics of Partnerships for Sustainable Development. In P. Pattberg, F. Biermann, S. Chan & A. Mert (Eds.), Public–Private Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Emergence, Influence and Legitimacy (pp. 21-43). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809313.00009
Oberholster, C., & Adendorff, C. (2018). Four Agricultural Financing Scenarios for Sub-Saharan Africa toward 2055: Conditions for Governmental Policy Interventions. World Futures Review, 11(3), 1-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756718770771
Oliver, J. J. (2023). Scenario planning: Reflecting on cases of actionable knowledge. Futures & Foresight Science, 5(3-4), e164. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.164
Pérez-Rincón, M. A. (2014). Conflictos ambientales en Colombia: actores generadores y mecanismos de resistencia. Ecología Política, 48, 76–82. https://www.ecologiapolitica.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/048_Perez-Rincon_2015.pdf
Pimienta, J., & De la Orden, A. (2017). Metodología de la investigación. Pearson Educación.
Quinteros, J., y Hamann, A. (2017). Planeamiento estratégico prospectivo: métodos MACTOR y SMIC. ECOE Ediciones.
Ramírez-Ríos, A., y Polack-Peña, A. (2020). Estadística inferencial. Elección de una prueba estadística no paramétrica en investigación científica. Horizonte de la Ciencia, 10(19), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.horizonteciencia.2020.19.597 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26490/uncp.horizonteciencia.2020.19.597
Reith, S. (2010). Money, power, and donor-NGO partnerships. Development in Practice, 20(3), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614521003709932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614521003709932
Roberts, N. C., & Bradley, R. T. (1991). Stakeholder Collaboration and Innovation: A Study of Public Policy Initiation at the State Level. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272004
Saritas, O., Pace, L. A., & Stalpers, S. I. P. (2013). Stakeholder participation and dialogue in foresight. In K. Borch, S. M. Dingli & M. S. Jørgensen (Eds.), Participation and Interaction in Foresight (pp. 35–69). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781956144.00009
Schepers, D. H. (2006). The impact of NGO network conflict on the corporate social responsibility strategies of multinational corporations. Business and Society, 45(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650306289386 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650306289386
Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279601
Sharma, S., Vredenburg, H., & Westley, F. (1994). Strategic Bridging: A Role for the Multinational Corporation in Third World Development. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 30(4), 458–476. http://hjb.sagepub.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/content/9/2/183.full.pdf+html DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886394304007
United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300
Yan, X., Lin, H., & Clarke, A. (2018). Cross-sector social partnerships for social change: The roles of non-governmental organizations. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020558
Zartha-Sossa, J., Halal, W., & Hernández-Zarta, R. (2019). Delphi method: analysis of rounds, stakeholder and statistical indicators. Foresight, 21(5), 525-544. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/FS-11-2018-0095/full/pdf?title=delphi-method-analysis-of-rounds-stakeholder-and-statistical-indicators DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2018-0095
Zeraoui, Z., y Farías, P. (2011). Prospectiva estratégica: corrientes, escuelas y tendencias. In Z. Zeraoui & E. Balbi (Coords.), Introducción a la Prospectiva (pp. 23-74). Montiel & Soriano Editores.
Downloads
Accepted 2023-10-25
Published 2023-04-21
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors assign the patrimonial rights to the journal and to Universidad del Valle on accepted manuscripts, but may make any reuse they deem pertinent for professional, educational, academic or scientific reasons, in accordance with the terms of the license granted by the journal to all its articles.
The journal publishes articles under the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International) license.