Main Article Content

Authors

This paper aims at contributing to a better understanding of Spinoza’s mostconspicuous political doctrines: his rejection of classical contractualism, hisdoctrine of the equivalence of right and power, his description of the limitsof government either as logical limitations or as restrictions, not of power,but of impotence, and his defence of democracy as the most natural andmost rational form of the state. Also, two alleged paradoxes that permeateSpinoza’s political thought are solved: the conflict between a naturalisticapproach and a discourse whose purpose is to shed light on the grounds ofpolitical legitimacy, and the tension between the dynamics of freedom andthe dynamics of power. Far from obsolete, Spinoza’s political philosophycomes to light as able to meet the demands of the contemporary world.

Modesto Gómez-Alonso

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca. Profesor encargado de Cátedra en la Facultad de Filosofía de la Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca. Áreas de interés: epistemología analítica, racionalismo moderno. Algunas publicaciones recientes: Ernest Sosa, Con pleno conocimiento (Trad., Introd., y Notas), Zaragoza: PUZ, 2014; “Existence and Actuality: Hartshorne on the Ontological Proof and Immanent Causality”, Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 46 (2013).Dirección Postal: Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, Facultad de Filosofía, Calle Compañía 5, CP: 37002, Salamanca-España.
Gómez-Alonso, M. (2015). Spinoza on Freedon, Individual Rights and Public Power (english version). Praxis Filosófica, (40), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.25100/pfilosofica.v0i40.3010
Balibar, E. (1998). Spinoza and Politics, London / New York: Verso.

Chomsky, N. (2011). How the World Works, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Curley, E. (1996): “Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan”, in D. Garrett (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 315-342.

Della Rocca, M. (2008). Spinoza, London / New York: Routledge.

Hobbes, T. (1985). Leviathan, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Hobbes, T. (2007). Behemoth or The Long Parliament, London: Elibron Classics.

Hobbes, T. (2008). Human Nature and De Corpore Politico, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Israel, J. I. (2001). Radical Enlightenment. Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lebuffe, M. (2010). From Bondage to Freedom. Spinoza on Human Excellence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Marlies, M. (1978): “Doubt, Reason, and Cartesian Therapy”, in M. Hooker (ed.), Descartes. Critical and Interpretative Essays, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 89-113.

Matheron, A. (1969). Individu et communauté chez Spinoza, Paris: Minuit.

Naaman-Zauderer, N. (2010). Descartes’ Deontological Turn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nietzsche, F. (1969). Selected Letters, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Oakeshott, M. (1991): “Rationalism in Politics”, in M. Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London / New York: Liberty Fund.

Spinoza, B. (1901). The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza. Volume II, London: George Bell and Sons.

Spinoza, B. (1972). Spinoza Opera. 4 vols. Edited by C. Gebhardt. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsverlag.

Spinoza, B. (1992). Ethics, Indianapolis / Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

Spinoza, B. (2000). Political Treatise, Indianapolis / Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.

Spinoza, B. (2007). Theological-Political Treatise, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stephen, J. F. (1991). Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, Chicago / London: Chicago University Press.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.